U.S. Supreme Court Agrees To Hear Government’s Appeal Of Sixth Circuit’s Ruling In U.S. v. Quality Stores That SUB Payments Are Not ‘Wages’ Subject To FICA Taxation

On October 1, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the federal government’s appeal of the Sixth Circuit’s decision in United States v. Quality Stores, Inc. (In re Quality Stores, Inc.), 693 F.3d 605 (6th Cir. 2012), rehearing denied, rehearing, en banc., denied, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 882 (6th Cir. 2013), cert. granted, Oct. 1, 2013 (No. 12-1408). Justice Elena Kagan did not participate in the decision to hear the case.

As previously reported in our September 10, 2012 Client Alert, “Pepper Victory: Sixth Circuit Holds that Supplemental Unemployment Compensation Benefits Are Not ‘Wages’ Subject to FICA Taxation,” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Quality Stores held that supplemental unemployment compensation benefit (SUB) payments paid by a bankrupt company to its former employees were not wages subject to taxation under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA). Accordingly, the employer and its former employees were entitled to refunds of amounts paid to the Internal Revenue Service on account of FICA taxes from severance payments that had been made after the employer filed for bankruptcy. The Sixth Circuit declined to follow a contrary 2008 decision on the issue of the Federal Circuit, CSX Corp. v. United States, 518 F.3d 1328 (Fed. Cir. 2008), the only other court of appeals decision to address the issue. The refund claim at issue in Quality Stores totals approximately $1 million (plus interest) and it is estimated that there are similar pending refund claims totaling more than $4 billion.

After the government’s petition for rehearing en banc was denied by the Sixth Circuit on January 4, 2013, the government filed a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court. Given the circuit split created by the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Quality Stores, the fact that the United States was the petitioner, the large dollar amount of pending refund claims, and various other factors, the Supreme Court’s decision to review the case was not unexpected. Briefing and oral argument in the case are expected to occur within the next few months and the Supreme Court is expected to issue its decision in the case during its current term.

Appellees Quality Stores, Inc., et al. are represented by Robert S. Hertzberg, co-chairman of the Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy Practice Group of Pepper Hamilton LLP and Michael H. Reed, a senior partner in the group. In the matter, Hertzberg and Reed also have consulted with Lisa B. Petkun, a partner in Pepper’s Tax Practice Group. Hertzberg will argue the case and will be joined by Reed on the brief.


Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Pepper Hamilton LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.