US Supreme Court Broadens Definition of "Opposition"; for Retaliation Claims; Crawford v Metropolitan Government of Nashville, 1-26-09


Retaliation under the employment discrimination laws is one of the most rapidly developing areas. Most of the recent major decisions have been in favor of the employees. The US Supreme Court in Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, 129 U.S. 846 (2009) ruled that employees that responded to an employer's questions about sexual harassment qualify for protection under Title VII's "opposition" clause.In effect, the employee need not initiate a complaint in order to be protected, and the employee need not express the opposition with any degree of frequency.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Labor & Employment Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Drew Capuder, Capuder Fantasia PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »