U.S. Supreme Court Curtails Claims against Carbon-Dioxide Emitters -- March 27, 2012

more+
less-

In a case last year, the United States Supreme Court held that plaintiffs cannot maintain nuisance claims against carbon-dioxide emitters based on federal common law, curtailing claims that may be brought against power companies and other emitters of greenhouse gases. The Court, however, did not decide whether plaintiffs can maintain nuisance actions against carbon-dioxide emitters based on state law, leaving that question open for consideration.

In American Electric Power v. Connecticut, 131 S.Ct. 2527 (2011), eight states, New York City, and three private land trusts sued four private power companies and TVA. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants were the “five largest emitters of carbon dioxide in the United States.” Because the defendants allegedly contributed to global warming, the plaintiffs asserted that their carbon-dioxide emissions constituted a “nuisance” under federal common law. As such, the plaintiffs sought a decree setting carbon-dioxide emissions for each defendant at an initial cap, to be further reduced annually.

Please see full update below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Energy & Utilities Updates, Environmental Updates, Personal Injury Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »