The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in the anxiously awaited Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International case (13-298). The issue in this case was whether a computerized system, method, and computer-readable medium for intermediated settlement of financial transactions was a patentable invention. The Court ruled unanimously that it is not.
Many observers have looked upon this case as a potential threat to the patentability of software since the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its en banc decision. The U.S. Supreme Court first found that the intermediated settlement concept is an abstract idea, which is excluded from patent eligibility under 35 USC §101 of the patent code, and “a fundamental economic practice long prevalent in our system of commerce.” The Court then considered whether the claimed computer implementation, either in its individual functions or the combination of functions, contained an “inventive concept” sufficient to transform the claimed abstract idea into a patent-eligible application. The examples provided with respect to a sufficient invention concept were an improvement in the functioning of the computer itself or an improvement in any other technology or technical field. Here, the Court found each of the claimed computer functions to be well-understood, routine and conventional activities previously known in the industry, and that the ordered combination of the functions added nothing to the functions as considered separately.
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.