On January 9, 2013, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued its first decision in a Covered Business Method Patent Review (CBM) proceeding, instituting the trial on all claims requested.
The decision issued in Trial No. CBM2012-0001, and was written by Chief Judge Tierney. SAP America, Inc. is the petitioner, who filed the CBM request on the first available day against a patent owned by Versata Development Group, Inc. While the full decision is an instructive read, we note some highlights below:
In the corresponding District Court litigation, a validity decision had already been made. The PTAB found that SAP still had standing, and disagreed with Versata’s position that the statute required ongoing litigation. Here, the case was on appeal to the CAFC, so there was no “final decision” for purposes of issue preclusion. As a result, the PTAB held that the district court’s judgment was not sufficiently firm to be given conclusive effect.
All It Takes Is One -
The PTAB confirmed that “the presence of a single claim is sufficient to institute a covered business method review.” The PTAB only analyzed one claim for CBM eligibility, but instituted trial for all requested claims.
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Appeals, Covered Business Method Patents, Final Judgment, Issue Preclusion, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patents, Software, Standing, Technological Invention Exception
Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Intellectual Property Updates, Science, Computers & Technology Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. | Attorney Advertising