USPTO Issues New Subject Matter Eligibility Examination Guidelines for Claims Involving Laws of Nature, Natural Principles, Natural Phenomena, and/or Natural Products

On March 4, 2014, the USPTO issued a Guidance memorandum for examination of subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 in view of AMP v. Myriad (2013) and Mayo v. Prometheus (2012). Under the new guidelines, the examiner will first determine whether the claim recites or involves one or more of laws of nature/natural principles, natural phenomena, and natural products, i.e., judicial exceptions. If it does not, the claim is patent eligible, provided it is directed to one of the four statutory patent-eligible subject matter categories. If it does, the examiner will weigh multiple factors to determine whether the claim as a whole recites something significantly different than the judicial exception(s) and thus is patent eligible.

The Guidance identifies the following factors weighing toward patent eligibility: a) Claim is a product claim reciting something that is non naturally occurring and markedly different in structure from naturally occurring products; Claim recites elements/steps b) that impose meaningful limits on claim scope, so that others are not substantially foreclosed from using the judicial exception(s); c) that relate to the judicial exception in a significant way; d) that do more than describe the judicial exception(s) with general instructions to apply or use the judicial exception(s); e) that include a particular machine or transformation of a particular article, where the particular machine/transformation implements one or more judicial exceptio (s) or integrates the judicial exception(s) into a particular practical application; f) that add a feature that is more than well-understood, purely conventional or routine in the relevant field.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  AMP v Myriad, Mayo v. Prometheus, Patent-Eligible Subject Matter, Patents, USPTO

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »