Utah Federal Court Holds Pain Pump Claims Not Related

by Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
Contact

In its recent decision in Columbia Casualty Company v. SMI Liquidating, Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162892 (D. Utah Nov. 14, 2012), the United States District Court for the District of Utah had occasion to consider the concept of “related claims” in the context of claims made products liability policies.
The insurance dispute in SMI Liquidating arose out of defective shoulder pain pumps manufactured by Sorenson Development, which was insured by Columbia Casualty under successive policies. The first such policy, issued for the period July 1, 2007 through July 1, 2008, had limits of liability of $10 million per claim and in the aggregate, subject to a $25,000 deductible per claim and a $125,000 deductible aggregate. Notably, the 07-08 policy contained a “related claims” provision that stated, in pertinent part:
If related claims are subsequently made against the Insured and reported to the Company, all such related claims, whenever made, shall be considered a single claim first made and reported to the Company within the policy period in which the earliest of the related claims was first made and reported to the Company.
The policy defined “related claims” as all claims arising out of the same occurrence or related occurrences. Further, the policy defined related occurrences as those “that are logically or casually connected by any common fact, circumstance, condition, situation, transaction, event, advice or decision in the design, formulation, manufacturing, distribution, sale, testing, use, operation, maintenance, repair or replacement of your product or your work.”
While the 07-08 policy was in effect, Sorenson was named as a defendant in four lawsuits relating to its pain pumps. Columbia initially treated these suits as separate claims, each triggering a separate deductible. Columbia did, however, have internal deliberations between its claim and legal departments as to whether the four suits should be considered related claims triggering only a single deductible.
Toward the end of the 07-08 policy period, Columbia began the underwriting process for a renewal. During this process, the Columbia underwriter learned of the pending pain pump claims and became concerned about future claims. She determined that the renewal would have different deductible terms than the 07-08 policy. She offered a renewal on the terms that all claims other than shoulder pump claims would be subject to the original $25,000 deductible per claim, with a $125,000 deductible aggregate, but that shoulder pump claims would be subject to a $250,000 deductible per claim, unaggregated. Sorenson’s risk manager understood at the time why the renewal would be on different terms and reluctantly agreed to it. The renewal became effective on July 1, 2008.
Claims continued to be made against Sorenson during the end of the 07-08 policy period and into the 08-09 policy period. In August 2008, some seven weeks after the 08-09 policy became effective, Columbia’s claim department decided to treat all pending claims as being related and thus covered only under the 07-08 policy. Notwithstanding its decision, Columbia continued charging Sorenson separate deductibles for each new claim made. Over the next year, as new claims were made against Sorenson, Columbia issued supplemental correspondence amending the grounds on which Columbia determined that the underlying claims were related. Thus, whereas Columbia initially took the position that various claims were related because they involved the same pain pump model, this later evolved into the position that any claims involving any pain pump model manufactured by Sorenson were related.
During a mediation in November 2009, the issue of related claims was brought to a head. Columbia advised that it would be tendering the remaining limits of its 07-08 policy in connection with an upcoming mediation, and that at that point, its coverage obligations would be terminated. Around the same time, Columbia learned of the fact that it had been charging multiple deductibles instead of a single deductible as it should have in light of its related claims position. Columbia tried to refund the “erroneously” paid amounts to Sorenson, but Sorenson refused to accept the check. Columbia subsequently filed a coverage action against Sorenson seeking a declaration that the pain pump claims were related claims covered only under the 07-08 policy, and not covered under the 08-09 policy.
In considering the issue, the court focused primarily on the deductible language contained in the 08-09 policy that specifically distinguished pump claims from non-pump claims. This deductible scheme, concluded the court, indicated “a clear and unequivocal agreement that shoulder pump claims would be covered, subject to specialized deductibles.” Columbia’s “related claims” position, observed the court, would negate this express and specific language. The court further concluded the concept of related claims in the 07-08 policy could be harmonized with coverage for pump claims in the 08-09 policy, agreeing with Sorenson’s contention that “whatever was intended to fall within the scope of the related claims’ clause, the parties specifically agreed that it would not include the expressly dealt with shoulder pump claims.”
While the court reached its conclusion based on the plain terms of the 08-09 policy, it noted that extrinsic evidence would have compelled the same holding. Specifically, the fact that Sorenson and Columbia negotiated the deductible scheme for the 08-09 policy indicated to the court that the parties considered and agreed on the manner in which the 08-09 policy would provide coverage for pain pump claims. Absent from these negotiations was any discussion that the specialized deductible would apply only if Columbia decided that pump claims made in 08-09 were not related to those made in the 07-08 policy. In this regard, the court found it “significant that Columbia’s decision to treat all shoulder pump claims as ‘related claims’ under the Year One policy post-dates the effective date of the Year Two policy by over a month.” Thus, the court concluded that the parties’ contemporaneous communications, at least at the time the 08-09 policy was issued, reflected a mutual understanding that pump claims would be covered under the 08-09 policy. Columbia’s subsequent decision that the claims would only be covered under the 07-08 policy “fundamentally altered the allocation of risk bargained for by the parties in the Year Two policy and was contrary to the parties’ express intentions at the time of contracting.”

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
Contact
more
less

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.