Valuing A Litigation Claim

Law firms are increasingly using a multitude of factors to value cases. Valuation provides the parties a better means to identify the issues in litigation, discuss which ones are in dispute, and calculate a logical resolution/settlement. Factors considered during valuation include the type and severity of injury or business interruption, impact of consequential damages, involvement of other parties, indemnity sources, and chances of prevailing.

Predicting the market value of a litigation claim is an inexact science but various methodologies exists to assist legal counsel and their clients in this effort. One methodology tool is the decision tree model which develops if/then scenarios and aims to predict all possible outcomes. A publication issued by Cogent Valuation discusses this methodology and points out the difference between valuing litigation and valuing damages. [The Valuation Of Litigation, Valuation Strategies, March/April 2006]

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Updates, Business Torts Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates, Labor & Employment Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Robert Freedman - Partner at Tharpe & Howell, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »