THE ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT PRESENTED NO SUBSTANTIAL AND NO MATERIAL EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT A FINDING THAT ANY STATE LAW AUTHORITY WAS VIOLATED BY THE STATE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE SO AS TO JUSTIFY DISCIPLINARY ACTION
THE ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT FAILED TO ENFORCE PROGRESSIVE DISCIPLINE WHEN IT IMPOSED A LESSER PENALTY ON ONE SUPERVISOR INVOLVED AND NO DISCIPLINE ON THE OTHER SUPERVISOR
THE ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT VIOLATED PETITIONER’S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS BY FAILING TO GIVE PROPER NOTICE OF THE CHARGES AND BY DEFINING CONFIDENTIALITY IN A VAGUE AND OVERBROAD MANNER
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In:
Constitutional Law Updates, Labor & Employment Law Updates, Administrative Law Updates
Reference Info:
Appellate Brief |
State, 6th Circuit, Tennessee |
United States
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Larry Woods, Tennessee State University | Attorney Advertising
