Wal-Mart Plaintiffs Seek to Change the Rules


After the Supreme Court rejected a nationwide class action by female Wal-Mart workers in the 2011 Dukes case, the plaintiffs filed smaller class actions in different parts of the country. Wal-Mart has persuaded several of the trial courts that these “second chance” class actions were filed too late. The courts have relied on a long standing rule, adopted by many federal appellate courts, that one class action does not pause the statute of limitations for a possible second class action.

Naturally, the plaintiffs want to overturn this “no-piggybacking” rule; it is blocking their class actions. Recently, the plaintiffs persuaded a district court to let them file an immediate appeal on the lateness issue. The next question is whether the appellate court will agree to decide the issue now. We will keep you posted. Love v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 12-cv-61959-RNS (S.D. Fla. Dec. 3, 2013).

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sherman & Howard L.L.C. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.