The Court held that Amway’s actions did not involve a horizontal restraint of trade in violation of the anti-trust statutes. Nitro operated a "tool" business, selling support and motivational materials to Amway distributors. Several members of the company sought to break away from Nitro and form a competing business. They asked for and received guidance from Amway about the process of breaking away. After the separation, Nitro's business failed and they sued Amway alleging an anti-trust conspiracy and horizontal restraints of trade. The Circuit Court held that these claims were properly dismissed. A horizontal restraint of trade is collusion by competitors at the same level of business. Amway, despite having it's own tools business, was not at the same level as Nitro and its spin off, therefore it could not horizontally restrain trade. The court found that the tools produced by Amway were different from those produced by Nitro, and the two companies were not materially in competition with each other. Further, Amway's actions could not support a claim of conspiracy because their involvement in the spin-off was limited to protecting its products business not the tools business allegedly in competition with Nitro.
Full case and case summary also available online at: http://www.mlmlegal.com/legal-cases/NitroDistributing_v_Alticor2.php
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.