Washington Court of Appeals Heralds New Developments in Damages for an Insurer’s Bad Faith Duty to Defend

more+
less-

On April 4, the Washington Court of Appeals issued its decision in Unigard Insurance Company v. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Company. The case pertains to the scope of damages that may be assessed for an insurer’s bad faith failure to defend and the applicable rate of prejudgment interest. The Court held that where the policyholder did not admit liability or confess judgment in a specific amount, the presumed harm from the insurer’s failure to defend — and therefore the bad faith damages — was the policyholder’s maximum potential liability in the underlying case. The Court also held that the prejudgment interest rate for torts, rather than the rate for contracts, applied to a bad faith and breach of contract case.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Business Torts Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, General Business Updates, Environmental Updates, Insurance Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Lane Powell PC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »