Water Loss Case Gives Rise to Dispute Over Bad Faith Standard For ‘Genuine Dispute’ and Admissibility of Expert Evidence

more+
less-

In a recent decision in the case of Pyramid Technologies, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Ins. Co., 752 F.3d 807 (9th Cir., May 19, 2014), the Ninth Circuit, relying on California law upheld a grant of summary judgment dismissing the insured’s business interruption claim as speculative and, by a split decision, reversed in part and remanded in part the trial court’s exclusion of the testimony from the insured’s expert witnesses under Daubert standards.  In addition, and most importantly, it also reversed a grant of summary judgment  concerning the insurer’s “genuine dispute” defense to the insured’s bad faith claims, holding that bad faith was an issue for the factfinder under the facts of the case.

In an upcoming Alert, Joann Selleck of the firm’s San Diego office and Maria Louise (Ria) Cousineau of Cozen’s office in Los Angeles will provide a considerably more detailed discussion of the case.   

Topics:  Admissibility, Bad Faith, Daubert Hearing, Daubert Standards, Evidence, Expert Witness, Water

Published In: Business Torts Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates, Insurance Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cozen O'Connor | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »