Weekly Law Resume - April 5, 2012: Unilateral Attorney Fees Clause in the Elder Protection Act Does Not Preclude Award of Costs and Expert Witness Fees to a Prevailing Defendant Under C.C.P. § 998


Katherine Lee Bates, et al. v. Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeal, Second District (March 12, 2012)

Appellant Katherine Lee Bates (“Bates”) was the administrator of the estate of Rinda Lou Bates (“Rinda”). Bates sued respondent Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital, Inc. (“PIH”) and several other defendants for injuries suffered by Rinda prior to her death. Following surgery for a broken hip at PIH, Rinda was discharged to her home under the care of nurses employed by Arcadia Home Health (“Arcadia”). Rinda developed a serious pressure sore over her coccyx which became severely infected, causing her death. At trial, Bates contended that the Arcadia home nursing staff failed to properly assess the severity of the pressure sore and immediately seek emergency treatment. Bates asserted that PIH was responsible for the negligent actions of the Arcadia nurses because PIH was a “licensee and operator” of Arcadia.

Before trial, PIH served a § C.C.P. 998 offer to Bates, offering a mutual waiver of costs and waiver of PIH’s claim for malicious prosecution in exchange for a dismissal of PIH with prejudice. Bates did not accept PIH’s C.C.P. § 998 offer, and it expired. At trial, Bates voluntarily dismissed her claims against PIH. As the prevailing party, PIH submitted a cost bill to Bates seeking $83,713 in costs, including $64,826 in expert witness fees based on C.C.P. § 998. Fees of experts not ordered by the court are ordinarily not recoverable as costs under C.C.P. § 1033.5. However, pursuant to C.C.P. § 998, if a defendant makes an offer to compromise that is not accepted “and the plaintiff fails to obtain a more favorable judgment or award,” the plaintiff “shall not recover his or her post-offer costs and shall pay the defendant’s costs from the time of the offer.” Section C.C.P. § 998 also provides that the court or arbitrator may require the plaintiff to pay expert witness fees actually incurred and reasonably necessary to the defense at trial or arbitration.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Low, Ball & Lynch | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Low, Ball & Lynch on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.