Stephanie Brennan v. Townsend & O'Leary Enterprises, Inc., et al. Court of Appeal, Fourth District (October 18, 2011)
In this case, the Court of Appeal held that judgment for an employer was proper where the plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence that she was subjected to severe or pervasive workplace harassment based on her gender.
Stephanie Brennan worked at an advertising agency from 1991 to 2005. In 2004, she inadvertently received an e-mail intended for another person that referred to her as "big-titted" and "mindless." Between 2000 and 2003, she witnessed an employee wearing a veil with a plastic penis during a staff meeting, an employee dressed as Santa Claus who asked three females personal questions, and the owner wearing a Santa hat with the word "Bitch" across the brow. Brennan sued the agency for sexual harassment, and the jury found in her favor. The agency moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The trial court found that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury's finding that Brennan was subjected to severe or pervasive sexual harassment and granted the motion.
Please see full article below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.