Weekly Law Resume - March 22, 2012: ADA Plaintiff Subject to Breach of Contract Claim For Suing a Business Owner a Second Time


Thomas Mundy v. Laura D. Lenc Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District (February 29, 2012)

Plaintiff Thomas Mundy is confined to a wheelchair. In June 2009, he went to a bar owned by Laura Lenc and could not use the restroom because it was not equipped with two adjacent grab bars. He was also unable to use the restroom mirror because it was mounted too high above the floor. Represented by attorney Morse Mehrban, Mundy sued Lenc for violating Civil Code sections 51, 54 and 54.1 because the restroom did not comply with the design accessibility standards set forth in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The parties entered into a settlement wherein plaintiff received $2,500, his attorney received $3,000 and Lenc received a general release of known and unknown claims. A year later, Mundy sued Lenc once again under Civil Code section 51 again claiming violation of the ADA. This time, he claimed that Lenc’s facility did not provide him with van-accessible handicap parking. In response, Lenc filed a cross-complaint for breach of the settlement agreement, false promise, intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation and abuse of process. Mundy responded by filing a special motion to strike. The trial court denied the motion and ordered the parties to submit briefs regarding Lenc’s entitlement to attorney fees as the prevailing party. Lenc was subsequently awarded $21,506 in attorney fees against Mundy and Mehrban based on the trial court’s finding that Mundy’s motion was frivolous. An appeal followed.

On appeal, Mundy and Mehrban argued that the trial court’s orders must be reversed because: the claims in Lenc’s cross-complaint arose from acts in furtherance of Mundy’s right of petition and Lenc failed to demonstrate a probability of prevailing on her causes of action; and Mundy’s special motion to strike was neither frivolous nor brought in bad faith, as a consequence, there was no basis for an award of attorney fees.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Low, Ball & Lynch | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Low, Ball & Lynch on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.