Weekly Law Resume - March 8, 2012: Imputed Notice of Dangerous Conditions in the Atypical “Slip and Fall” Case

more+
less-

Tom Getchell et al. v. Rogers Jewelry Court of Appeal, First District February 7, 2012

This is not the typical “slip and fall” case. Plaintiff Tom Getchell (“Getchell”) was a business invitee of defendant Rogers Jewelry Store (“RJS”). He worked at RJS as an independent contractor repairing jewelry. At times he worked in the back break room, which was only accessible to Getchell and RJS employees. On the date of the incident, he was setting up his tools in the break room when he slipped on jewelry cleaning solution and fell, sustaining injuries. Getchell filed a personal injury complaint against RJS alleging negligence and premises liability. He alleged that: 1) he slipped in jewelry cleaning solution in the break room of RJS’s store and; 2) the solution leaked on the floor from its container or was poured on the floor by an RJS employee. Getchell’s wife sued for loss of consortium.

The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of RJS after finding that Getchell failed to establish that RJS had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition. Getchell appealed, contending that he was not required to show that RJS had notice because RJS employees created the dangerous condition that caused his injury.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

more+
less-

Low, Ball & Lynch on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×