Originally published in Law360 on December 17, 2012.
Left open by the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut, 131 S. Ct. 2527 (2011), was the question of whether state law nuisance claims for the emission of carbon dioxide were viable in the face of the Clean Air Act. That question continued to be answered in the negative with the decision of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania last month in Bell v. Cheswick Generating Station, GenOn Power Midwest L.P. (W.D. Penn. Oct. 12, 2012), which was appealed to the Third Circuit the Friday before Thanksgiving. In Bell, plaintiffs, neighbors to the defendant’s coal-fired electricity generating plant, filed suit alleging:
that the [defendant’s] atmospheric emissions fall upon their properties and leave a film of either black dust (i.e., unburned coal particulate/unburned coal combustion byproduct) or white powder (i.e., fly ash). According to the Plaintiffs, those discharges require them to constantly clean their properties, preclude them from full use and enjoyment of their land, and “make [them] prisoners in their own homes.” Order at 2.
Please see full article below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Clean Air Act, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Injunctions, Nuisance, Preemption
Published In: Civil Remedies Updates, Conflict of Laws Updates, Energy & Utilities Updates, Environmental Updates, Personal Injury Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© McCarter & English, LLP | Attorney Advertising