What Does the Future Hold in View of the Supreme Court Decision on Isolated Genes and cDNA?


In a long-anticipated ruling, the US Supreme Court acknowledged Myriad Genetics’ contribution in discovering the location and sequence of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes but concluded that “Myriad did not create anything” when it isolated those genes. Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., No. 12-398, slip op. at 12 (US June 13, 2013). The Court did, however, find that laboratory-engineered complementary DNA (cDNA) remains patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The Court explicitly stated that it did not address, among other things, the patent-eligibility of DNA sequences in which the naturally occurring nucleotides have been scientifically altered.

The Issue -

Before the Supreme Court were Myriad’s composition claims relating to isolated DNA sequences for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and synthetically created cDNA related to these genes. Mutations in these genes are associated with a predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© White & Case LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


White & Case LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.