What Is The Lesson Of Oxford Health Plans v. Sutter?

more+
less-

The Supreme Court today decided Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter. This decision expands the scope of class actions in arbitration. In Oxford Health, the court took back what the court gave in Stolt-Nielsen, where the court had ruled that an arbitrator may not order a class arbitration when the parties’ contract is silent on the point. Here, the contract seemed to be silent, but was broadly written. Too broadly written, as it turned out.

The language authorizing a “civil action” in arbitration allowed the arbitrator to rule that the parties intended for class arbitration to be maintained because a class action is a “civil action.” As long as there is some basis for that decision, as there was here, the Supreme Court will not overturn it.

The lesson continues to be for companies to include clear prohibitions of class arbitrations in their contracts. Otherwise, as the court noted in its decision, the “potential for those mistakes is the price of agreeing to arbitration.”

 

Topics:  Arbitration, Class Arbitration, Oxford Health, Oxford Health v Sutter, SCOTUS

Published In: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Carlton Fields Jorden Burt | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »