When the Project Matters


Eminent domain presupposes that the government desires to acquire a property interest for a public project. The public project can be a road or a school or something far more exotic (think acquisition of an NFL team, as in City of Oakland v. Oakland Raiders, 646 P.2d 835 (Cal. 1982), or acquisition for an integrated plan for economic development, as in Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469, 472 (2005).

But what happens when "the project" is vague or uncertain? Can the property owner defeat the condemnation? How can the owner show severance damages if the scope of the project isn't clear? And how will the concept of "project impacts" be applied when the exact nature of "the project" is unknown?

Originally published in The Practical Real Estate Lawyer on May 3, 2014.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Eminent Domain, Public Projects, Takings

Published In: Constitutional Law Updates, Commercial Real Estate Updates, Residential Real Estate Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »