Who You Gonna Call? Anybody?


We lawyers are always telling people to document their files. “If it’s not in writing, it didn’t happen,” we advise. That’s still true, but let’s stop writing everything down for just a minute, and ask ourselves if people are losing all interest in conducting business conversations over the phone.

Each year, students are asked to write essays on the relative merits of texting and talking. (The “Study Mode ” website has links to more than 370 essays and term papers on the benefits and dangers of texting.) Texting a message to someone on the other side of the lunch room may be one way to ask the object of one’s desire to the school dance, but it lacks that sincere, personal touch.

A 2012 Time magazine report noted, “Americans ages 18–29 send and receive an average of nearly 88 text messages per day, compared to 17 phone calls. The numbers change as we get older, with the overall frequency of all communication declining, but even in the 65 and over group, daily texting still edges calling 4.7 to 3.8.” I assume that the study didn’t count all the telemarketing calls that seniors receive daily.

In business, we are seeing professionals of all stripes using emails as the default mode of communication. And why not? They’re efficient, written and establish a record of being sent and received. When I ask a younger colleague to “call” someone, he or she will invariably send an email instead, unless I add “(note the verb)” in my request. “Call” has become just another word for “communicate,” with any other synonym considered interchangeable.

Is reading a text or email the same as hearing someone speak? Consider “The Voice,” the popular TV talent competition. Would it have the same viewership if it were “The Lyrics,” with the words to the songs simply scrolling up the screen? Would you pay more than $100 for “concert” tickets to watch the words to Santana’s “Evil Ways” projected on the megatron at the stadium? Probably not. Voice, tone and inflection make a communication more personal, more affecting. To borrow a term from techland, vocal communications have much wider bandwidth.

Professionals can learn much more about their clients’ levels of satisfaction, concern or disaffection in a voice-to-voice exchange than from a 140-character message. It’s an opportunity for the client to ask for clarifications and for the professional to glean what other “value added” services the client might need.

Should those meaningful vocal communications be memorialized in writing? Yes, certainly, although  some care is needed, as my partner Steven Young advised in one of the first posts in Professional Liability Advocate.

Professionals walk a tightrope, upon which the need for “professional distance” is balanced with the need to appear (and be) caring and concerned.

Hmm, a tightrope is sort of a lifeline, isn’t it? And it looks a lot like a phone wire, strung between two poles …

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Wilson Elser | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Wilson Elser on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.