Who's Liable For Vendor's CAN-SPAM Violation?

more+
less-

[author: Kathryn L. Ossian]

Perhaps your organization uses a marketing company or other servicer that sends out email on your behalf.  What happens if that vendor is alleged to violate the federal CAN-SPAM Act and your organization gets sued as a result? The answer will likely depend on the terms of your contract with that vendor.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Gordon v Commonwealth Marketing Group, Inc., upheld a marketing services company's duty to defend and indemnify its advertising client who was sued by a third party alleging violations of the CAN-SPAM Act. Because the underlying contract between the company and its vendor included an express indemnification for breaches of the CAN-SPAM Act, the court found that the duty to defend arose "unambiguously" when the third party claim was filed. This decision underscores the importance of having enforceable contract terms, tailored to the services being provided and protecting your organization in the event of third party lawsuits. To review the Ninth Circuit decision, click here:  http://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/11-35877/

 

Published In: General Business Updates, Communications & Media Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Miller Canfield | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »