Whose Life Expectancy is it Anyway? IRS Relaxes Position for Accumulation Trust RMD Determination


In a recent Letter Ruling, the IRS relaxed its position regarding which beneficiaries of an accumulation trust must be taken into account when determining which beneficiary's life expectancy should be used to determine required minimum distributions (RMDs).

Under Treasury regulations, if retirement benefits are left to certain trusts known as "see-through trusts," the benefits can be distributed in annual installments over the life expectancy of the oldest trust beneficiary. If the trust is required to distribute all RMDs to certain beneficiaries (a conduit trust), the rules are clear as to which beneficiaries must be considered in determining who is the oldest. If the trust is not required to distribute all RMDs (an accumulation trust), the pool of beneficiaries which must be considered is less clear.

Under previous Letter Rulings, a succession of contingent remainder beneficiaries were considered when determining which beneficiary is the oldest, until a beneficiary was found that would receive the trust assets outright with no conditions (such as attaining a certain age). The beneficiary pool to consider could then include an heir-at-law, not specifically mentioned in the document, with a remote contingent interest in the trust. The unnamed heir-at-law could have a very short life expectancy which would be the determining one for calculating the RMDs.

In this recent Letter Ruling, PLR 201320021, the IRS held that the child of the participant was the only beneficiary that needed to be taken into account for purposes of determining the RMDs, even though under the terms of the testamentary trust a child of the participant would not receive the trust assets outright until he attains the age of 35.

As a general rule a trust may not be named as designated beneficiary of an IRA unless it meets the following requirements as a see-through trust:

  1. the trust is valid under state law or would be, but for the fact there are no trust assets;
  2. the trust is irrevocable or will, by its terms, become irrevocable on the death of the employee;
  3. the beneficiaries of the trust who are beneficiaries with respect to retirement plan assets are identifiable from the trust instrument; and
  4. relevant documentation has been timely provided to the retirement plan administrator or IRA custodian.

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Baker Donelson | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.