You need to prove your case: California Supreme Court confirms wage-and-hour defendants have right to argue individualized defense in class action trials

by DLA Piper
Contact

Class action trials have long been the bogeyman no one talks about in California. Parties had to address whether a class action was “manageable” before it was certified, but because the vast majority of class actions never proceed to trial, no one really knew what the rules were to craft a trial plan for these types of representative actions.

On May 30, the California Supreme Court in Duran v. U.S. Bank National Association confirmed that not only must a trial plan be addressed before a case can be certified as a class action, but the trial plan, and specifically the use of representative testimony and sampling of data, cannot be used to deprive wage-and-hour defendants of their right to question the appropriateness of this methodology when there are individualized questions presented.

This case has far-reaching ramifications. It has the potential to dramatically shape the way employment class actions proceed in California and how employers evaluate these cases going forward.

The case at issue involved the alleged misclassification of loan officers as exempt outside salespeople.  After substantial litigation, the case proceeded to trial utilizing the testimony of 20 individual loan officers, plus two named plaintiffs.  This representative testimony was used to assess the liability for the entire class, despite the testimony of the plaintiff’s own expert that at least 13 percent of the class was classified correctly.  U.S. Bank was unable to introduce the testimony of any additional individual loan officers through live or declaration testimony; despite these shortcomings, the court extended the liability findings based on this limited representative testimony to the class as a whole.

The case proceeded to the California Supreme Court, where it addressed two overall issues: (1) how does a trial plan interact with a class certification decision? and (2) at trial, how can representative testimony and statistical sampling be used to prove liability?  The Supreme Court was very clear in its guidance on these points: a trial plan must be evaluated before a class is certified, and that trial plan must be developed with expert input and must afford the wage-and-hour defendant an opportunity to impeach the statistical model used or otherwise show its liability is reduced.

First, the Supreme Court was extraordinarily clear on when a trial plan should be addressed in a representative action.  “Trial courts deciding whether to certify a class must consider not just whether common questions exist, but also whether it will be feasible to try the case as a class action. . . .  Class certification is appropriate only if those individual questions can be managed with an appropriate trial plan.”  Further, even though it is determined that common issues predominate over individualized issues in the case, there must be a second analysis of how those common issues will be tried.  “After a class has been certified, the court’s obligation to manage individual issues does not disappear. . . . [E]ach plaintiff must still be some means prove up his or her claim on any ground not resolved in the trial of common issues.”  Further, courts can no longer rely on assurances that a statistical plan will eventually be developed to assess liability – there must be some proof of that plan before the certification decision is reached.

The California Supreme Court did allow that if sufficient common questions exist to support class certification, it may be possible to manage individual issues through the use of surveys and sampling.  However, statistical methods cannot entirely substitute for common proof.  Where there is no proof of an unlawful common policy or practice, statistical analysis cannot be used to “prove” liability.  And, if a trial plan includes representative testimony or statistical sampling, a preliminary assessment should be done to determine the level of variability of the class.  “If the variability is too great, individual issues are more likely to swamp common ones and render the class action unmanageable.”

This is not to say that a wage-and -hour defendant has an unfettered right to present individualized evidence, nor is it always a due process violation when a defendant is unable to exam every putative class member.  But a wage-and-hour defendant has substantial rights here.  As the court noted, “If liability is to be established on a classwide basis, defendants must have an opportunity to present proof of their affirmative defenses within whatever method the court and the parties fashion to try these issues.  If trial proceeds with a statistical model of proof, a defendant accused of misclassification must be given a chance to impeach that model or otherwise show its liability is reduced because some plaintiffs were properly classified as exempt.”

Finally, the court gave some guideposts regarding the use of statistical sampling.  First, the sample must be sufficiently large to provide reliable information about the larger group.  Second, a sample must be randomly selected for its results to be fairly extrapolated to the entire class.  And finally, there must be a sufficient indicia of reliability for the sample to be used.

While this case concerned a misclassification class action, the holdings of the California Supreme Court have implications for defendants facing all manner of wage-and-hour cases.  From the defense perspective, this case should also impact analysis of California Private Attorney General Act cases.  Any time a defendant has an affirmative defense regarding an individual employee (which is the case with most wage-and-hour cases, including misclassification, meal and rest periods, expense reimbursement and off-the-clock work), and liability is to be determined for a group of people using statistical sampling or representative testimony, a trial plan must be developed that allows the defendant to adequately raise those defenses.  Further, such issues should not be addressed only on the eve of trial, but must be evaluated earlier in the case. 

Gone are the days of assuming a representative action will never be tried, or that a sampling methodology can be established in the future.  Now, plaintiffs must affirmatively develop trial plans, which will be a key phase in all representative actions in California.  This case also highlights the need to have effective, lawful employment policies that can be presented to the court.  Such lawful policies can prevent a plaintiff from simply using sample statistics to “prove” liability at the certification stage.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© DLA Piper | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

DLA Piper
Contact
more
less

DLA Piper on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!