Your Client Has Obtained Privileged Documents Belonging to the Adversary. What Do You Do Now?


As lawyers, we must frequently weigh our duties to our clients against our duties to courts and third parties, including adversaries. One way this tension presents itself is when a client comes into possession of confidential or privileged documents belonging to the other side. Should we look at the documents? Can we use them to our client’s advantage? Must we disclose that our client has received the confidential information? The answers depend, to some extent, on how the information is obtained.

A recent opinion by the New York State Bar ethics committee concludes that, in some circumstances, Rule 1.6 prohibits the lawyer from disclosing the fact that his client has obtained privileged documents belonging to an adversary unless the lawyer knows the client has engaged in fraudulent or criminal conduct or "governing judicial decisions or other law require disclosure."

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Nicole Hyland, Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.