A Win for Queequeg: The Ninth Circuit Holds that Tattooing is Constitutionally Protected

Occasionally, I can’t resist the temptation to digress into other legal areas. Today’s opinion by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Anderson v. City of Hermosa Beach (Case No. 08-56914, Sept. 9, 2010) is one of these irresistable tempations.

That case involved a challenge to a city’s ban on tattoo parlors. No, the city didn’t ban tattoos, just the parlors. In finding the ban unconstitutional, the court held that “tattooing is purely expressive activity rather than conduct expressive of an idea, and is thus entitled to full First Amendment protection”.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×