Rozenberg v. Bacigalupo

Opposition and Reply Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents


The issue on the appeal was whether, in an action under RPAPL Article 15, a party seeking a declaration of a prescriptive easement, in whose favor the court has found on the facts, is entitled to an express pronouncement in the final judgment explicitly declaring the existence of a prescriptive easement. The appellant's brief is available on this site as a related document.

The issue on the cross-appeal was whether the court below properly found that the Plaintiffs-Appellants established the existence of a prescriptive easement.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Appellate Brief | State, 2nd Circuit, New York | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Lisa Solomon, Lisa Solomon, Esq. Legal Research & Writing | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Lisa Solomon, Esq. Legal Research & Writing on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.