Court Denies Former Client’s Anti-SLAPP Motion Filed in Response to Attorney’s Cross-Complaint for Misrepresentation


It is not uncommon for an attorney sued for malpractice to respond to the complaint by filing an anti-SLAPP motion, contending that the lawsuit arose out of a protected activity. Most of those motions are denied. A novel twist on the application of the anti-SLAPP procedure can be found in Masten v. Miller, King & James, LLP, an unpublished decision handed down by the California Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division One) on January 21, 2011.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sedgwick LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Sedgwick LLP on:

Popular Topics
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.