The Genuine Dispute Doctrine Is Alive and Well in California

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Contact

Plaintiffs’ lawyers have been celebrating the California Supreme Court’s decision in Wilson v. 21st Century Ins. Co., 42 Cal. 4th 713 (2007), which clarified how courts should apply California’s "genuine dispute doctrine" on summary judgment. Some practitioners have gone so far as to claim that, after Wilson, the doctrine is dead. Not so. As the saying goes, reports of the genuine dispute doctrine’s death have been greatly exaggerated.

The "genuine dispute doctrine" is a creation of California case law. It holds that insurers do not act in bad faith as a matter of law if there is a genuine dispute regarding whether the insured’s claim is payable.

Please see full newsletter for more information.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Contact
more
less

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide