The Narrowing of Patentable Subject Matter by the Federal Circuit: In Re Nuijten and In Re Comiskey


Since the eighteenth century, the scope of patentable subject matter under the Patent Act has encompassed four categories—“process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter.”[1] Until recently, these categories were broadly construed to encompass “anything under the sun that is made by man.”[2] In the 1998 State Street Bank decision, the Federal Circuit made it clear that this broad scope of patentable subject matter also includes business methods.[3] In that case, the patented invention related to a method of allowing multiple mutual funds to pool their resources and take advantage of economies of scale.[4] The next year, the Federal Circuit held in AT&T v. Excel

that any process that provides a “useful, concrete, tangible result” is patentable subject matter.[5]

The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences followed the AT&T holding in Ex Parte Lundgren, which rejected a separate “technological arts” requirement and found that an invention of a method of compensating a business manager based on comparative performance, which did not require the

use of a computer or any specific machinery, was patentable subject matter.[6]

Recently, the Federal Circuit issued two opinions that substantially narrow what was previously thought to be within the purview of 35 U.S.C. § 101. The Federal Circuit held that a business method, when not combined with a machine such as a computer, is not patentable, and that a

signal, on its own, is also not patentable. These two decisions create three new conditions for patentability not previously recognized in the case law: a “technological arts” requirement, a “nontransience” requirement, and a “tangibility” requirement.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.