Herengracht Group v. Wm Wrigley Jr. Co.

Herengracht Group v. Wm Wrigley Jr. Co., Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss False Marking Claim


THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant WM. Wrigley Jr. Company's ("Defendant" or "Wrigley") Motion to Dismiss [ECF No.8] ("Motion"). Qui tam Relator Herengracht Group LLC ("Herengracht") filed a Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 29] ("Response"), and Defendant filed a Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 31] ("Reply").

The court granted the motion to dismiss after finding that Herengracht failed to plead sufficiently the required element of intent under FRCP 8(a) (much less the more-stringent standard of FRCP 9).

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Decision | Federal, 11th Circuit, Florida | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Bryan Beel | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Bryan Beel on:

Popular Topics
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.