Supreme Court Limits Scope of Wire and Mail Fraud in Skilling v. United States


The Supreme Court last week, in the case of Skilling v. United States and two companion cases, severely curtailed the reach of the federal mail and wire fraud statutes by confining the “intangible right of honest services” to only those schemes that involve bribes or kickbacks. In so doing, the Court rejected the government’s argument that honest-services fraud should apply more broadly to undisclosed self-dealing and conflicts of interests. Justice Ginsburg wrote for the Court. Three other Justices (Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Kennedy) concurred in the judgment but would have gone even further and struck down the honest-services fraud provision in its entirety, finding it unconstitutionally vague and therefore in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.1

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Foley Hoag LLP on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.