CARB Moves Forward with Supplement to AB 32 Scoping Plan

As readers may be aware, in May 2011, Judge Goldsmith of the San Francisco County Superior Court (Association of Irritated Residents, et al. v. California Air Resources Board, et al., Case No. CPF-09-509562) found that the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) analysis of project alternatives in its AB 32 Scoping Plan was not sufficient under CEQA. Although CARB appealed the decision, CARB staff nevertheless prepared a Supplement to the Scoping Plan that attempts to address the Court’s concerns, and is now receiving public comment on the Supplement. The public comment period closes on July 28, 2011; the Board is scheduled to consider approval of the Supplement on August 24, 2011.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×