CMS Finalizes Rules Restricting Stark Whole-Hospital Exception


On November 2, CMS released a display copy of the 2011 Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System Final Rule. The display copy is available here, and the rule will be printed in the Federal Register on November 24.

Among many other provisions, the final rule implements provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”) restricting the Stark law’s whole-hospital exception. Much of the final rule follows the course that CMS charted in its proposed rule this summer. Key provisions of the final rule and CMS’s preamble are:

• Definition of Procedure Rooms

• CMS is limiting the definition of “procedure rooms” to the categories specified in the ACA (i.e., only those rooms in which catheterizations, angiographies, angiograms or endoscopies are performed). Accordingly, physician-owned hospitals remain free to increase the number of procedure rooms in which other types of non-operative procedures are performed.

• Number of Operating Rooms, Procedure Rooms, and Beds. Absent a waiver, the ACA prohibits physician-owned hospitals from increasing the number of operating rooms, procedure rooms, and beds beyond that for which they were licensed on March 23, 2010. Recognizing that operating rooms and procedure rooms may not be separately licensed, CMS has instructed hospitals to count rooms that “were in existence and operational” on March 23. More significantly, CMS has interpreted the limitation as setting an aggregate cap — i.e., that a hospital’s aggregate number of operating rooms, procedure rooms, and beds cannot increase. Thus, a physician-owned hospital may, for example, retire an existing procedure room and open a new operating room. This interpretation may present an opportunity in particular for physician-owned hospitals with excess bed capacity.

• Relocation. CMS confirmed that physician-owned hospitals can relocate, in whole or in part, provided that the aggregate number of operating rooms, procedure rooms, and beds does not increase.

• Changes in Physician Ownership. CMS confirmed that the level of physician ownership may fluctuate over time, provided that it does not at any point exceed the March 23, 2010 level. This is the case even if the hospital itself redeems and reissues physician interests.

• Terms of Physician Ownership. In response to a comment, CMS stated that, “[d]epending on the facts,” conditioning a physician’s ownership on continued practice of medicine in the community “could implicate” the ACA’s prohibition against conditioning ownership on a physician’s ability to refer. Provisions similar to that described in the comment are not unusual. Physician-owned hospitals should review the terms of their operating, partnership, or shareholder agreements in light of this commentary.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:


Ropes & Gray LLP on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.