Ex Parte Ward

Decision of US PTO Board of Patent Appeals & Interferences


US Patent & Trademark Office Board of Appeals and Interferences finds that claims for a novel & nonobvious card game that could be played in a casino do not recite patent-eligible subject matter, applying Supreme Court decision of In re Bilski (June 2010). The U.S. had been the only patent-granting jurisdiction protecting card games. This case considers such claims to be merely for an abstract idea and hence not patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. 101. Implicitly it calls into doubt existing U.S. patents for games licensed to casinos in Las Vegas, Atlantic City etc. as well as other patents on games.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Decision | Federal, Federal Circuit, Patent | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Gerry Elman | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Gerry Elman on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.