Absolute Right to Amend Complaint Until an Answer Is Filed – Williams v. Gaffin Industrial Services

more+
less-

In this wrongful death case, the trial court dismissed the complaint with prejudice on the basis that the plaintiff had previously elected the State’s worker’s compensation remedy, and that this election barred the current claim.  At the hearing on the motion to dismiss, the trial court did not permit the plaintiff to amend the complaint.  On appeal, the defendant contended that the plaintiff lost the absolute right to amend because a motion to dismiss had been filed.  The appellate court reversed, holding: “Contrary to Gaffin’s contention, it had not filed a responsive pleading; it had filed a motion to dismiss. . . . Therefore, rule 1.190(a) expressly gave [plaintiff] the absolute right to amend the complaint. . . . [A] trial court does not have discretion to deny leave to amend on the basis that the complaint is not amendable until (1) the defendant has filed an answer or (2) the plaintiff has already exercised the right to amend once.”

Williams v. Gaffin Industrial Services, 37 Fla. L. Weekly D1261a (Fla. 2d DCA May 25, 2012)

 

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Trenam Kemker | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »