United States v. Richard Villar

Defendant's Memorandum of Law Addressing Harmless Error Analysis


The Defendant was convicted of Bank Robbery. A juror notified counsel after the verdict that racist comments had been made by other jurors pertaning to the Defendant's nationality and perceived immigration status. Intitially on a motion for new trial the court determined that FRE 606 prohibited extensive voir dire of the jury panel. On appeal the First Circuit determined tha the Defendant's consttutional right to an impartial jury trumped Rule 606 and remanded. During the remand the trial judge asked th parties to brief whether therror could ever be harmless. This brief addresses that issue.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Post-Trial Motions | Federal, 1st Circuit, New Hampshire | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Michael Iacopino, Brennan Caron Lenehan & Iacopino | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Brennan Caron Lenehan & Iacopino on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.