advanced

Contributor: Morrison & Foerster LLP 

SUMMARY: In February 2010, over 30 lawsuits were filed against companies in myriad industries—including computer, pharmaceuticals, consumer products, auto parts, and video games—alleging false patent marking under 35 U.S.C. section 292. Even before this recent surge, false marking lawsuits had been increasing over the last few years, as plaintiffs’ lawyers have realized the many advantages of a false marking suit over a traditional patent infringement suit: for instance, there is no need to have a patent of one’s own, anyone can sue, litigating the case often is easier and less expensive, and the potential damages are enormous.

However, defendants accused of false patent marking have many possible defenses. And, with a few easy steps, companies can avoid or reduce liability. Below, we pose and then answer six important false marking questions.

Please see full alert below for more information.

DOCUMENT INFO

RELATED DOCUMENTS BY MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

• Legal Article/Newsletter:
  Don't Be an Easy Mark: Steps to Avoid Substantial Damages for False Patent Marking

• Legal Article/Newsletter:
  False Patent Marking: The Federal Circuit Provides Some Clarity

Morrison & Foerster LLP With more than a thousand lawyers in eighteen offices around the world, Morrison... [Profile | Documents]

Legal alerts directly on LinkedIn:

• get legal updates on your LinkedIn homepage
• customize with subjects that matter to you
• connect to lawyers whose work you value