In Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, the US Supreme Court resolved a circuit split and ruled that the equitable defense of laches does not bar a plaintiff’s claim for damages brought within the Copyright Act’s three-year statute of limitations. The Court held that the owner of a screenplay could seek to recover damages from a movie studio for the film Raging Bull after waiting 18 years to file suit. In doing so, the Court all but eliminated the laches defense in copyright infringement actions and established a precedent that allows copyright owners to seek damages even if they waited many years to bring suit and the defendant invested significant resources in reliance on that delay.
Frank Petrella, in collaboration with boxing champion Jake LaMotta, wrote a screenplay that chronicled the boxer’s career. In 1976, Petrella and LaMotta assigned their motion picture rights in the screenplay, which MGM acquired. MGM released Raging Bull in 1980.
Rights in the copyright to the screenplay reverted to Petrella’s daughter, Paula Petrella, who renewed the copyright and became its sole owner in 1991. Ms. Petrella’s attorney notified MGM that she had obtained the copyright in the screenplay and that MGM’s continued exploitation of Raging Bull infringed her rights. She did not file suit against MGM until 2009, however, some 18 years after acquiring ownership of the work.
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Copyright, Copyright Infringement, Damages, Laches, MGM, Petrella v. MGM, Raging Bull, SCOTUS, Screenplays, Statute of Limitations
Published In: Art, Entertainment & Sports Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, Intellectual Property Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© White & Case LLP | Attorney Advertising