Court Decides Buy-Out Claims Are Derivative

Allen Matkins
Contact

When a shareholder sues corporate officers and directors, she must decide whether to bring a direct action (which may be a class action) or a derivative suit. The consequence of making the wrong decision may be dismissal of the shareholder’s suit as was the case recently in Sweeney v. Harbin Electric, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82872 (D. Nev. July 27, 2011).

In Sweeney, the plaintiff filed a class action suit when he learned that the board of directors of a Nevada corporation had received a buy-out offer from the corporation’s chief executive officer and an investment fund. The plaintiff alleged breach of fiduciary duty against all of the defendants (except the corporation) and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty against the corporation. U.S. District Court Judge Robert C. Jones granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss finding that the case was a derivative action. In doing so, Judge Jones quoted the following from my treatise...

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Allen Matkins
Contact
more
less

Allen Matkins on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide