Memo May Signal Increased NLRB Attention to Mandatory Arbitration of Employment Claims


In what may be a sign of greater scrutiny of mandatory arbitration clauses, the outgoing General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a memo that is intended to review and clarify the NLRB’s position on mandatory arbitration clauses. Employers routinely mandate that employees sign arbitration clauses as a condition of employment. Such clauses, often upheld in court as valid provided they do not limit employees’ substantive remedies, prohibit employees from challenging employment practices in a venue other than private arbitration. While experts’ and employers’ opinions on such clauses vary widely, supporters of the use of arbitration clauses maintain they can substantially limit employers’ employment litigation defense costs.

While the clauses typically do not address matters before the NLRB, even in nonunion work forces the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) applies. Section 7 of the NLRA states, among other things, that employees can join in concerted activities (whether through a union or otherwise) for the purpose of mutual aid and protection. According to the memo, mandatory arbitration agreements do not impinge on Section 7 rights, so long as the agreements make clear that only individual rights to file a lawsuit in court are waived and that employees retain their Section 7 rights, including the right to challenge the agreements through concerted activity under the NLRA.

With respect to requiring the arbitration of claims that would potentially be part of class action lawsuits – currently a very hot topic – those that are filed by employees for their mutual aid and protection implicate NLRA rights. However, not all class action lawsuits or grievances involve protected concerted activity. Such claims must be analyzed on a case by case basis. Nonetheless, a mandatory arbitration agreement that prohibits all class action grievances and lawsuits likely impinges upon protected activity.

The memorandum encourages NLRB regional offices to give close attention to mandatory arbitration clauses. Employers using or considering such clauses are well advised to review them with legal counsel in light of possible increased NLRB attention. Possible additions to an overly broad mandatory arbitration agreement could include language assuring employees:

1. That the agreement does not constitute a waiver of employees’ collective rights under Section 7, including the employees’ right concertedly to pursue any covered claim before a state or federal court on a class, collective, or joint action basis;

2. That the employer recognizes the employees’ right concertedly to challenge the validity of the forum waiver agreement upon such grounds as may exist at law or in equity; and

3. That no employee will be disciplined, discharged, or otherwise retaliated against for exercising their rights under Section 7 of the NLRA.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Austin Legal, LLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Austin Legal, LLC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.