Jury's Royalty Rate Quadrupled After Judgment in Eastern District of Texas Patent Case


Judge Folsom of the Eastern District of Texas has just published the latest chapter in the story of post-judgment remedies in patent cases, after the Supreme Court decision in eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange, LLC, 126 S. Ct. 1837 (2006). In an opinion that is likely to garner much attention, the court awarded post-judgment damages using a royalty rate that was nearly quadruple that awarded by the jury for past damages ($98 per vehicle sold versus $25). Paice LLC v. Toyota Motor Corp., No. 2:04-CV-211 (E.D. Tex. April 17, 2009). Several factors may make this case factually unique, and the decision has not been subject to review by the Federal Circuit, but the significantly increased royalty rate awarded post-judgment will certainly make many in the IP world stand up and take notice.

Please see full update for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.