WORKING... advanced

Medical Malpractice Pain and Suffering Verdict Reduced from $1,750,000 to $425,000; Appeals Court Gives No Explanation

Contributor: John Hochfelder 
RSS

SUMMARY: In yet another significant New York personal injury lawsuit, an appeals court has modified downward a jury’s pain and suffering verdict with no explanation why, leaving the public clueless, judges and attorneys without guidance as to how to evaluate future cases and the plaintiff with $1,325,000 less than the jury awarded him. And the decision has forced me to dig out, gather and present here the missing information.

In Dehaarte v. Ramenovsky, the judges of the Appellate Division, Second Department last week issued a decision on the plaintiff’s appeal of an August 3, 2007 jury verdict in his case against doctors accusing them of medical malpractice. After a Kings County jury found in his favor , Kern Dehaarte, then 22 years old, was awarded pain and suffering damages in the sum of $1,750,000 ($250,000 past, $1,500,000 future) but the appellate court has now held that the award was unreasonably excessive.

Please see full article below for more information.

Download: Word (.doc) [201KB] | PDF [461KB]


DOCUMENT INFO

Doc Type:
Legal Article/Newsletter

Published: 11/16/2009
See Related Docs

Legal Article/Newsletter Name:
Medical Malpractice Pain and Suffering Verdict Reduced from $1,750,000 to $425,000; Appeals Court Gives No Explanation

Subject Matter:
Personal Injury
Civil Procedure
Civil Remedies
Professional Malpractice

RELATED DOCUMENTS BY JOHN HOCHFELDER


 

Lawyers, learn how JD Supra can help you reach new clients.
Email Address:

I am a: