Purchasers Get Burned, by Cyndee Todgham Cherniak


Counsel and advisors to clients engaged in real

estate transactions should be cautious when

providing advice on the GST status of uninhabitable

real property. The decision in Yakabuski v. The

Queen,1 which was decided under the Tax Court of

Canada's informal procedure, requires that the

parties characterize a supply of residential property

according to the immediate state of the property,

without reference to how the property was

characterized in the past. In the Tax Court's view,

residential real property can change in character:

what was previously exempt can revert back to a

taxable status without a corresponding change in

use or recovery of embedded GST.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Lang Michener LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Lang Michener LLP on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.