Palacio Capital Partners, Inc. v. Cha

Reply in Support of Motion to Quash Service of Summons for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, Or, In the Alternative, Motion to Stay or Dismiss the Action on the Ground of Forum Non Conveniens


The plaintiffs filed suit in California Superior Court alleging various causes of action related to a Florida real estate development. The defendant moved to quash service of summons for lack of personal jurisdiction, or, in the alternative, to stay or dismiss the action on the ground of forum non conveniens. The court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss on the ground of forum non conveniens without having reviewed her reply papers in support of her motion to quash service of summons for lack of personal jurisdiction.

I drafted this document in its entirety. Others made minor edits.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motion Addressed to Pleadings | State, 9th Circuit, California | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Marie Scheibert | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Marie Scheibert on:

Popular Topics
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.