A three judge panel of the Ohio Court of Appeals recently reversed the DUI conviction of a motorist because the police officer lacked sufficient and legal "reasonable suspicion" to initially stop the motorist and begin his DUI investigation. The decision is State v Browning, and the written opinion was issued on September 5, 2012. The three judge panel hearing the case sits in the ninth judicial district of Ohio. The defendant Browning's initial DUI conviction took place in Barberton Municipal Court. The municipal court judge denied Browning's motion to suppress for lack of probable cause/reasonable suspicion to make the initial stop. As noted above, the Ohio Court of Appeals reversed Browning's conviction.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Criminal Law Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Steve Sumner, Attorney at Law | Attorney Advertising