Plaintiff v. U.S. Bank and Barclays

Opposition to Demurrer by Foreclosing Defendant regarding Tender Rule, MERS and Preemption of Unlawful Detainer Judgment


Here is an opposition to a demurrer filed by the foreclosing defendant which was a trustee for a mortgaged-backed securities fund. The issues were the preemption of the post-foreclosure unlawful detainer judgment, the role of MERS and the tender rule.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Business Torts Updates, General Business Updates, Consumer Protection Updates, Finance & Banking Updates, Residential Real Estate Updates

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motion Addressed to Pleadings | State, 9th Circuit, California | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cameron Totten, Law Offices of Cameron H. Totten | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »