Uncertain Times: Three Distinct Approaches to Ongoing Patent Royalties

more+
less-

The Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in eBay Inc. v. MercExchange overturned decades of Federal Circuit precedent by rejecting the Federal Circuit’s “general rule” of granting a permanent injunction upon a finding of patent infringement. 547 U.S. 388 (2006). Any court that declines to grant a permanent injunction must now decide whether and how to award an “ongoing royalty rate” for future damages following a verdict of patent infringement. In the absence of Federal Circuit precedent, district courts have crafted three different approaches to the ongoing royalty issue, each of which presents benefits and drawbacks.

The “General Rule” Prior to eBay v. MercExchange

Prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in eBay v. MercExchange, courts traditionally granted a permanent injunction following a finding of infringement. As the Federal Circuit explained in Smith Int’l Inc. v. Hughes Tool, 718 F.2d 1573 (Fed. Cir. 1983), denying an injunction would “seriously undermine” the constitutional purpose of patent rights and curtail the patentee’s right to exclude. Smith, 718 F.2d at 1578. The Federal Circuit went on to state in Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co. Ltd, 868 F.2d 1226, 1247 (Fed. Cir. 1989), that “[i]t is the general rule that an injunction will issue when infringement has been adjudged, absent a sound reason for denying it.” District courts applied this general rule almost without exception, and any prevailing patentee could expect to obtain a permanent injunction barring post-verdict infringement.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×