My recent musings about the Court of Appeals' December 6, 2011 Southern Seeding decision (my original blog post about the case is here; a longer treatment in this quarter's Change Order, published by the Construction Law Section of the North Carolina Bar Association, can be found here) neglect to address the opinion's implications for surety companies issuing payment bonds in North Carolina.
Those implications are profound and potentially far-reaching, and certainly worthy of discussion. So for those of you, like me, who have a keen interest in North Carolina suretyship law, you'll definitely want to keep reading.
[See full article for more information].
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In:
Construction Law Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Matt Bouchard, Lewis & Roberts, P.L.L.C. | Attorney Advertising
